Skip to content

The Parts We Play: Building Trust, Collaboration & Partnerships

September 6, 2011

In ‘As You Like It’, William Shakespeare described the world as a stage, upon which we as actors, will change the parts we play.  In the world of marketing relationships its important to know who you are, the role you play – and where others fit into your world. There are different dynamics at play in different levels of business relationships –

A Transactional Relationship, is relatively simple, often easy to replace (if it stalls) and the conversation is based on unit costs and delivery, with the talk based around standard offers, rate cards, scopes and specifications. A Managed Relationship – requires a boutique service, a tailored offer,  specialist reporting or pricing. It is complex – but at its heart, it is still a vendor-purchaser transaction with the invoicing going one way. A Partnership – requires both parties to have a shared understanding, to collaborate and build a joint plan, understanding what value the other party is seeking.  It may involve cash. It may not – as cash is not the only currency. It will more than likely require both parties to change what they do as ‘business as usual’. A partnership requires more communication, more conversation time – and its movement forward is oiled by a lot of trust. How do you know when you need to treat a relationship as a partner? The simple test is that if its difficult, expensive if not impossible to replace – then you’d be a fool not to treat such a high value relationship as a partnership. You need to nurture it; be it a critical supplier, a valuable customer or a hard to get content provider. This was reinforced to me recently in this great piece by Seth GodinTalent and Vendors. Godin points out the essential distinction between managing talent, which does not have a set product to sell, and trading with a vendor. He says; “While the talent is also getting paid (to be in your movie, to do consulting, to coach you), she is not a vendor. She’s not playing by the same rules and is not motivated in the same way. A key element of the distinction is that in addition to the varying output potential, vendors are easier to replace than talent is.”

It’s difficult to replace special talent. And its difficult to replace highly valuable partners. In fact, as every partnership and relationship manager knows, they are a lot easier to lose than to obtain and the contract agreement is the start of the work, not the end of it. A valuable partnership needs a lot of resources and the aim is to build mutual value and trust.

On this point,  Jamie Billingham also recently published an interesting graphic explaining how an increase in TRUST (that mysterious and highly valuable element of business relationships) – takes a connection to become a collaboration, through an increase in shared risk and reciprocity. It’s a smart and simple way to think about it. At Benchstone, we often discuss how the three key Partnership Gears – Fit, Planning and Momentum – are ‘oiled’ by Trust, created with a high level of communication and getting the simple ‘little steps’ in place. Without an ability to build trust, the relationship either stalls, goes backwards and ultimately fails. Or – it can be retrieved and revert to a transactional relationship. In many cases, a transactional and highly functional relationship is all that is required. But – if you are seeking to build smarter collaborations, product innovations and dynamic fresh ideas – then richer relationships are required. And the part you play in creating a culture of mutual trust will ultimately decide what the outcome of the final Act will be…

(C) Jamie Billingham. It's all about Trust

And its Trust keeps the Partnership Gears moving in the right direction...

For the full piece by Seth Godin see – Talent and vendors. And to see the work of Jamie Billingham click here.

For more information and articles on partnerships and collaboration see www.benchstone.co.uk or visit andrewarmour.com

5 Comments
  1. Great post! I especially love the last bit “if you are seeking to build smarter collaborations, product innovations and dynamic fresh ideas – then richer relationships are required. And the part you play in creating a culture of mutual trust will ultimately decide what the outcome of the final Act will be…”

    Patrick Lencioni, in Overcoming the Five Dysfunctions of Teams talks a lot about trust being the foundation of any functional group, team or partnership.

    He suggests that you should build the trust first, in any relationship that has value. He also suggests that the part you play in creating that culture of mutual trust, is to give that trust freely. I know not everyone agrees but it is something to think about. What are your thoughts on this?

    jamie

  2. Hi Andrew,
    Really nice piece. I think you unpacked the trust component really well. I think it’s always easy to overlook the small (seemingly so) components of collaboration. But the price tag they carry in a complex collaboration is astounding.

    If you’re comfortable with it, I would like to include your piece in my weekly selection of articles.

    very best and keep up the great effort
    Jelenko

Trackbacks & Pingbacks

  1. Michael Lynch: Secrets To Success,Innovation – And Avoiding Burning Buildings… « Andrew Armour's Benchstone Blog
  2. The CollaborativeEdge Part Two: The Programme « Andrew Armour's Benchstone Blog
  3. ROADMENDER Recommends | ROADMENDER

Thanks for reading. Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: